Showing posts with label Sandy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sandy. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Buying Guide: Best Sandy Bridge motherboard: 8 tested

Sandy Bridge processors certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons when Intel released them. Some of those metaphorical pigeons were their own loyal customers.

Those who had bought a Socket 1156 platform must have felt like they had received a slap round the chops, as barely 12 months after releasing the splendid Lynnfield, Intel had produced a CPU family that redefined the standard for performance and price.

Sandy Bridge's release is doubly harsh as the new processor uses a different socket, making for an expensive upgrade for anyone trying to stay up to date.

It seems odd that Intel couldn't work the new architecture into a package that would fit the existing LGA 1156 socket. After all, the package size is identical, and even though the LGA 1155 socket has a different pin layout (it isn't just a case of having one less pin) and orientation notch layout, is the move to a new socket really necessary?

To support Intel's Second Generation core architecture we have the new 6X Express (Cougar Point) series of chipsets. The two chipsets that were launched along with the new processors will also be the most visible in the channel; the performance P67 and the mainstream consumer H67.

Motherboards featuring these two chipsets already feature heavily in manufacturers' line-ups. But these two aren't the only ones supporting the new processors. Intel has already announced the Q67, B65 and H61, with varying differences in their feature sets for various other market sectors (more on these later).

Chipset overview

Dirt 3

DIRT 3: If Sandy Bridge was an 80's car rendered in DiRT 3, then it'd be the Audi Quattro...

The 6-series chipset architecture, built on 65nm process with a TDP of 6.1W, can be seen as a development of the popular 5-series chipsets with some key changes and improvements.

First and foremost is the upping of the bandwidth of the eight PCI-e 2.0 lanes from the current 2.5GT/s (max of 250MB/s per lane per direction) to a more respectable 5GT/s, which is more in line with what AMD chipsets currently support. This doubling of the transfer rate means that now there is up to 500MB/s of bandwidth in each direction.

Combining these 8 PCI-e lanes with the 16 lanes in the Sandy Bridge processors gives a total of just 24 PCI-e lanes, a hell of a lot less than Intel's X58 (40 lanes) or even AMD's 890FX (42 lanes) so it's something to consider if you are thinking about upgrading from your present system.

The DMI interface (linking the CPU and chipset) has also had a speed increase up to 20GB/s for both upstream and downstream lanes. The other new feature of the 6-series chipset is the native support of SATA 6Gb/s, albeit only by a maximum of two ports: the remaining maximum of four ports are SATA 3Gb/s.

The inclusion of native SATA 6Gb/s and an increase in bandwidth of the PCI-e interface reduces bottlenecks and allows for better performance of things such as USB 3.0, for which motherboard manufacturers will have to use a third-party controller(s), as Intel still hasn't got around to building this in natively.

Intel has been slow off the mark with this but it's rumoured to be one of the features of the next generation (Panther Point) chipset due out sometime in 2012.

The memory support is as the previous 5-series chipsets; two channels of up to DDR3-1333 with a maximum of 32GB (8GB dual sided DIMM modules) supported. Another of the old legacy parts disappears with the P67, H67 and H61 chipsets as there is no native support for that good old boy, the PCI slot.

If manufacturers want to put one on a board with these chipsets they're going have to add a third-party chip to control it, adding a few more bucks to the cost of the board. Up to 14 USB 2.0 ports are supported as well as integrated Gigabit Ethernet.

USB 3.0

USB 3.0: NEC chips can be found offering up USB 3.0 support on the latest mobos

At the present time Intel has five new chipsets in the 6 series: the mainstream P67 Express and H67 Express; the budget H61 Express; the B65 Express Chipset for the business sector; and the Q67 for the corporate boys. What's the difference?

P67 Express

Along with the H67, the P67 Express is the first of the new chipsets to see the light of day.

Aimed at the mainstream performance user, it supports the 16 PCI-E 2.0 lanes built into the Sandy Bridge CPUs with either a single x16 full speed slot or two slots running at x8/x8 speed supporting both SLI and CrossfireX – but not at full speed because of the limited amount of available PCI-e lanes.

It supports up to 14 USB 2.0 ports, two SATA 6Gb/s and four SATA 3GB/s ports and the latest version of Intel's Rapid Storage Technology.

It's also the only one of the new chipsets that presently supports Intel's Performance Tuning (overclocking to you and me). But on the flip side it's also the only one of the line-up that doesn't support Intel's FDI (flexible display interface) and as such it cannot access the integrated graphics of the Sandy Bridge cores.

So it only uses dedicated graphics and as a result doesn't support Protected Audio Video Path content protection technology, Intel's InTru 3D or Clear Video technologies.

H67 Express

If you want to use all the loveliness of the integrated HD2000/3000 graphics capability of the Sandy Bridge processors then the mainstream consumer H67 Express is definitely the option to go for. It supports a variety of outputs: DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort – as well as Protected Audio Video Path and Intel's InTru 3D technology.

Protected Audio Video Path (PAVP) is Intel's content protection technology, which enables the Sandy Bridge graphics core to decode encrypted video purely in hardware. It comes in two flavours.

First is Paranoid, where the video stream is encrypted and the decoding accelerated by the graphics core, with PAVP reserving 96MB of system memory for its own use. It's used mainly for streaming lossless audio formats such as DTS-HS MA or Dolby TrueHD. Using this setting not only uses system memory it also disables the Aero interface in Windows.

The Lite setting does much the same thing as Paranoid but without reserving any system memory and is ideal for playing HDCP-protected content, the core only accessing system memory when it is needed and returning it back when it's finished.

Officially the H67 has had the ability to support dual graphics removed, as the 16 PCI-e lanes provided by the Sandy Bridge core are not split 8/8 so it only supports a single x16 PCI-e slot running at full speed. That's not to say you won't see any H67-based boards with two slots. It's just that because of the lack of PCI-E lanes the second slot is reduced to running at x4 speed.

Here's one thing to look out for if you buy a motherboard with the H-series chipset, which has a graphics card slot: as soon as you drop in a discrete graphics card, the integrated graphics are automatically switched off.

While the H67 doesn't support Intel's Performance Tuning technology and has a locked memory multiplier, it does allow some overclocking to be done to the graphics core. Just like the P67, it supports Intel's Rapid Storage Technology.

H61 Express Chipset

The H61 is aimed squarely at the budget end of the spectrum. With just six PCI-e 2.0 lanes and a single x16 PCI-e lane, it supports only two DIMM slots and only has 3Gb/s SATA support. And although it can look after four ports, it has no built-in RAID support (though that should come as no real shock looking at where it's aimed at).

As with its bigger sibling the H67, it also supports the integrated graphics of the SandyBridge core but like the P67 it doesn't support Intel's Clear Video technology. It will only support 10 USB 2 ports.

The B65 Express

The B65 is aimed at the SMB market. It has a feature set similar to the H67, with eight PCI-e lanes and support for the graphics core of the Sandy Bridge processors, but with subtle differences.

It only supports up to 12 USB 2.0 ports and its six SATA ports are split between a single SATA 6Gb/s and five SATA 3Gb/s ones. It also brings back support for PCI slots, which is understandable for this market segment.

Intel Q67 Express

This chipset is probably one you won't come across much, if at all, in the consumer space as it's aimed at the corporate boys. It's also expected to be joined by the Q65 at some stage, which is very much the same but with support for only a single SATA 6Gb/s and hardware and software ACHI instead of Intel's Rapid Storage Technology.

As can be expected for a chipset aimed at this part of the market it comes with a whole bucketful of Intel technologies aimed at protecting both the system and the data stored on it, as well as a few others not in the other chipsets; Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d), Intel® Anti-Theft Technology, AMT Version 7, Active Management Technology, vPro Technology and Intel Trusted Execution Technology.

Like the B65, the Q67 retains the PCI slot, which is understandable given where systems built with motherboards using either of these chipsets are going to end up, where the use of PCI expansion cards is a lot healthier than in the consumer space.

On the horizon

If you're looking to overclock, it's the P67 and no integrated graphics support. If you want that, then it's the H67, but you can't overclock. What's really needed is a hybrid of the two chipsets.

Batman

BUILDING THE FOUNDATIONS: Sandy Bridge is a great basis for a gaming machine. Don't you agree?

If the rumour mill is to believed then this may well happen, with a sixth chipset joining the party in Q2 2011. That's the rumoured Z68, which could be the most interesting of them all, bringing together the P67 native dual graphics and OC functions, plus the H67's support for FDI.

Another technology rumoured to be part of the Z68 is RST (Rapid Storage Technology) SSD Caching, this could mean that it enables an SSD drive to be used as a cache drive while using a hard drive for storage, and the driver build that accompanies it will also allow for RAID support for drives over 2.2TB. There's still no native USB 3.0 support on offer though.

Variations on a theme

Of course, there are no hard and fast rules as to what these chipsets are used for – there never is, and motherboard manufacturers will always pick and choose which market segment they think a chipset would be good for and even which chipset features they want to use, regardless of where Intel or AMD may think they should be aimed at.

For instance, Gigabyte has the GA-P65A-UD3, which is built around the B65 chipset but is being used as an entry-level board in the consumer space, and the quite frankly bizarre PH67 chipset, which is the H67 with the display connectivity removed. Yes, we were scratching our heads at this one too.

Intel may have aimed the P67 Express at the performance end of the mainstream market but there's a problem with the amount of PCI-e lanes that the chipset combined with the processor can provide for the graphic cards slots.

The only real way around it is to use a third-party chip to provide more lanes, either with Lucid's Hydralogix chip as Sapphire has done with its Pure Black P67 Hydra, or as Gigabyte and Asus have done with their flagship P67 boards (GA-P67A-UD7 and Maximus IV Extreme respectively).

Nvidia's NF200 chip allows for two full x16 speed slots in CrossFire or SLI modes and for 3-way SLI. MSI, which leads the way with using Lucid's original version of the Hydralogix, has a new version of the chip in its bonkers new P67 board, the Big Bang Marshal. It has eight, yes eight PCI-e slots and no, they don't all run at x16 speed, only four of them do. If for some unimaginable reason you want to stick eight cards in it, they'll only run at x8 speed.

Details are scare but it seems that this version of the chip is more like a bridging chip than one that allows mix and matching of graphics cards.

Manufacturers have been quick to pick up what the H67 can offer for small motherboards and while many of the board makers have been quick to stick the H67 in a Mini ATX format. This an ideal format for it because of its support for integrated graphics, some have been even more inventive and gone for an even smaller format – mini- ITX, which for those unfamiliar with the concept is a motherboard built on a PCB that's just 17.1cm square.

Whether all these tiny boards from Asus (P8H67-I Deluxe), ECS (H67H2-I), Foxconn (H67S), Gigabyte (GA-67NUSB3) or Zotac (H67-ITX WiFi) make it to these shores is an unknown, but even Intel itself has got into the act with the DH67CF. Rumours abound that Gigabyte even has a P67-based mini-ITX board in the pipeline.

Even in this niche market, mobo makers are keen to outshine the opposition. So we have the Asus board offering Bluetooth and SO-DIMM memory support; the Zotac H67-ITX WiFi with built-in 802.11b/g/n wireless networking; and Gigabyte's GA-67NUSB3 providing dual HDMI output.

By combining one of these boards with one of the forthcoming low-voltage Sandy Bridge CPUs you can build some pretty impressive and feature-rich small format systems such as a media centres or HTPCs. And with notebook drives now reaching 1TB, storage space in one of these wee boxes is no longer the problem it once was.

Although Intel has announced the budget H61 chipset, no official release date has been set at time of going to press. But that hasn't stopped Jetway, Foxconn and MSI from producing boards built around it.

Asus P8P67M-Pro - £110
P67 Chipset

Asus p8p67m-pro

Riffing on the 'small, but perfectly formed' design ethos, Asus' P8P67M-Pro is packing a lot into it's teeny, tiny footprint.

If you cast your mind back to a few years ago, micro ATX (mATX) boards were seen very much as the poor relations of the motherboard world; they didn't support the latest processors or chipset technologies and weren't exactly overly blessed in the features department either.

One look at the P8P67M-Pro from Asus though shows exactly where the small format motherboard is now in the consumer, and more importantly the manufacturer's, consciousness.

Read the full Asus P8P67M-Pro review

ECS P67H2-A Black Extreme - £150
P67 Chipset

ECS p67h2-a black extreme

Everybody's doing it and so is ECS, releasing its top-end Sandy Bridge motherboard, the P67H2-A Black Extreme. ECS may not be as well known as some of their rivals but it does seem to come out with some interesting boards, especially its Black Extreme series for the enthusiasts.

And the latest addition to this line is no exception. It combines Intel's Sandy Bridge combination of the Socket 1155 CPU support and the P67 chipset with Lucid's Hydra graphics technology. That extra chip allows the board to support mix and match combinations of graphics cards.

Read the full ECS P67H2-A Black Extreme review

Foxconn H61MX - £60
H61 Chipset

Foxconn h61mx

While all the flashy high-end motherboards make the news, win awards and make many a geek swoon, the real bread 'n' butter end of the market is down at the other end of the coal face in the value market segment.

Here making boards that don't cost that much to build and shifting them in huge numbers is the name of the game.

Although you may find some mobo manufacturers using the B65 business-orientated chipset in this market segment, Intel's de-facto chipset for the value end of the market is the H61 Express, which is basically a cut down version of the H67, with only SATA 3Gbps support and offers 10 USB 2.0 ports instead of 14, making it an ideal platform for entry level PCs.

Read the full Foxconn H61MX review

Foxconn H67S - £65
H67 Chipset

Foxconn h67s

The new Sandy Bridge processors are stupidly, impossibly, hilariously quick. By some metrics, they're the most impressive new CPUs in memory. However, one of the downsides is the requirement for a new motherboard.

Still, if you're going to make the migration to a new Sandy Bridge system, why not consider a small-form factor board such as the H67S?

As the name suggests, it's based on the H67 chipset and supports the heavily revised integrated graphics core that appears in each and every Sandy Bridge CPU. The new core is available with either six or 12-execution units, respectively known as the Intel HD Graphics 2000 and 3000 models.

Read the full Foxconn H67S review

MSI H61MU-E35 - £60
H61 Chipset

MSI h61mu-e35

There are a couple of routes to take if you are designing a motherboard for the value end of the market, do you just give the basics at a good price or do you add features you think people will want and, indeed, pay extra for in a board in this market segment.

While Foxconn has taken one route with Intel's H61 value chipset with the H61MX, MSI has taken the polar opposite with the H61MU-E35. They might be both built around Intel's value chipset and both built on a Micro ATX PCB, but there the similarity ends.

Read the full MSI H61MU-E35 review

MSI P67A-GD65 - £140
P67 Chipset

MSI p67a-gd65

This here P67 board from MSI represents something very different from the it's top-end Big Bang board. This isn't necessarily aimed at the high-end enthusiast segment, this is a board for people wishing to build up their new platform with a reasonable feature-set and at a reasonable price.

The bonus of having so much move over to the CPU is that actually manufacturing motherboards is a little cheaper and so you get a lot for your £140.

There's full SLI and CrossFire licensing, the latest line in USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gbps storage interfaces and the 'Military Class' components that make these MSI boards rather robust.

Read the full MSI P67A-GD65 review

Sapphire Pure P67 Hydra - £160
P67 Chipset

Sapphire pure p67 hydra

We've already taken a look at Sapphire's first Intel-based motherboard: the Pure Black X58, which together with the AMD based White Fusion announced Sapphire's re-emergence into the motherboard market.

Hot on its heels comes the second high-end Intel based board, the Pure Black P67 Hydra, which, as you might gather from the name, not only uses Intel's current flagship chipset for the Sandy Bridge CPU's, the P67 Express, but also makes use of Lucid's HydraLogic graphics technology.

Read the full Sapphire Pure P67 Hydra review

Zotac H67-ITX WI-FI - £120
H67 Chipset

Zotac h67-itx wifi

Back in the mists of time (Okay, October 2001) when VIA released its first ITX EPIA motherboards, my how people laughed. A tiny little motherboard they all said, why it's just a toy!

But a few people understood the concept and could see the possibilities, and from time to time the format would peek above the parapet to see if anybody was still interested.

Fast forward to today and maybe, just maybe, Intel's H67 chipset could be the making of the concept. And if Zotac's H67-ITX WiFi is any indication of where were heading, then we're in for some interesting times ahead.

Read the full review

Benchmark analysis

It's demonstrative of just how much important goodness has been moved from the motherboard to the CPU itself that the benchmark results below are so damned close. In performance terms there is relatively little that manufacturers can do to separate their boards from the fierce competition.

That said the MATX P8P67M-Pro does a reasonably good job of putting some distance between it and the other boards in a few of our benchmarks at least. Most specifically in the gaming benchmarks where Asus boards traditionally do well.

It's also interesting to note that the new H61 boards give a pretty good showing in performance terms, demonstrating that there's little sacrifice in speeds, despite the loss of key parts of the feature set compared to the similarly-priced H67.

The performance of the two mini-ITX boards has likewise been impressive and the Sandy Bridge platform could well give rise to some frankly awesome, tiny gaming machines. Just look at the discrete card performance the likes of Zotac's H67-ITX WiFi.

bench 1

bench 2

The best Sandy Bridge motherboard is...

Asus p8p67m-pro

Trying to find an out and out winner in a range of Sandy Bridge motherboards that you'd actually buy is surprisingly tricky. With so much functionality being removed from the motherboards themselves there's very little between any of these boards in performance terms.

Where the different boards do differentiate themselves though is in assessing the feature set that they offer: Can they give you decent multi-GPU options? Do you have the latest in SATA and USB I/O technology? And how fully-featured is the relevant BIOS?

Of course, in this test we've been looking at the affordable end of the Sandy Bridge motherboard lineup, and if you were really interested in getting the most out of your second gen Intel Core CPU, whatever the cost, this isn't where you'd be looking.

At the £300 mark you can see the difference in performance. Just look at the Asus Maximus IV Extreme or the MSI Big Bang Marshal boards, those pricey, chunky fellows offer far more in the way of processing and overclocking grunt. But those boards cater for a relatively small percentage of users.

These mid-price to low-end boards here represent the bulk of Sandy Bridge motherboards that us normal folk are likely to buy. So which one should you pick up then?

To us the obvious winner is the excellent mATX P8P67M-Pro from Asus. It's got a huge range of features from SATA 6Gbps and USB 3.0 to fully fledged SLI and CrossFire support. That's a lot of functionality to pack into a small form factor motherboard.

It's not the fastest mobo in all of our tests, indeed some of the H61 boards post better Cinebench R11.5 scores, but it's a great all-round package. And it's also got Asus' great gaming pedigree too, which means that it's more than capable of offering great frame rates.

We reviewed the CyberPower Gamecube, an excellent little gaming machine, and with this wee mobo we 're looking at the basis for another small giant of the gaming PC market for sure. Being able to have a serious gaming system clothed in a small chassis, without having to make a compromise, is a very attractive proposition. After all you don't want to have a behemoth of a chassis bulging out from beneath your desk if there's no need for it to be that size.

Interestingly, the even smaller mini- ITX boards were almost as impressive. The Foxconn H67S and the pricier Zotac ITX WiFi offer decent performance figures in a frankly ridiculous form factor. Of course they don't have anywhere near the feature set of even their slightly bigger brethren, but for a fixed function they're worth a look.

The only issue with the Zotac board, as packed as it is, is that huge price tag. You may get USB 3.0 and a HDMI socket, but it's tough to say whether that's really worth paying twice as much as the almost-as-good Foxconn H67S.

It's still worth mentioning our personal bug bear with the make up of the desktop Sandy Bridge – the lack of processor graphics access when a discrete card is used. In a H67, or even H61 setup, losing access to the QuickSync transcode core is a disappointment if you want to have the opportunity to game with your rig too.

Lucid's Virtu GPU virtualisation tech should be ready soon, and ought to just be a simple update for the relevant boards. And that could end up being the death knell for the P67 platform. It will give you simultaneous access to both the Sandy Bridge graphics core and a discrete PCI-e card depending on which is better suited to a particular task.

There's also the spectre of the as yet unconfirmed Z68 chipset on the horizon, offering P67 performance with a processor graphics connection to boot. At the moment though if you're after a decent, feature-rich P67, then the bargainous P8P67M-Pro will serve pretty much all your needs.




View the original article here

Monday, April 18, 2011

In Depth: Sandy Bridge and AMD Fusion: hybrid chips explained

We recently reviewed one of AMD's latest Fusion processors as part of the Asus E35M1-M Pro motherboard. Like Intel's recent Sandy Bridge chips, they combine a programmable graphics engine onto the same piece of silicon as the CPU. It's a modern minor miracle in metal.

Like the first wave of Intel's CPU/GPU hybrids, these initial Fusion chips from AMD cleverly and cautiously avoid underwhelming us by targeting netbooks, where performance expectations are pretty low. For Intel, it was bolting a rudimentary graphics core onto an Atom to create Pinetrail.

AMD's new Bobcat CPU architecture is more forward looking, but by going up against Pinetrail and low-end notebooks, it looks perhaps better than it is.

AMD will follow the trail that has been forged here, though. Over the last 12 months, Intel has moved up the value chain with its CPU-die graphics. Arrandale brought the technology to Core i3 and Core i5 chips, and while the launch of Sandy Bridge at CES may have been spoiled by the swift recall of compatible motherboards, it was still briefly triumphant.

Faster and cheaper than the outgoing Nehalem architecture, Sandy Bridge is eminently suited to heavy lifting tasks that can harness the parallel pipelines of GPUs, such as video and photo-editing. The implications for mobile workstations alone are a little mind numbing, and more than one commentator believes it augurs the death of the discrete graphics card.

The single silicon future isn't quite upon us, however. Without wanting to put a timescale on things, the chances are PC Format readers will still be buying add-in GPUs for a while yet, for one reason and one reason only. Integrated graphics of any sort are and always have been rubbish for gaming.

Fusion and Sandy Bridge may still have that new chip smell about them, but they've been in the public eye for a long time. Fusion was formally announced to the world in 2006, around the same time that AMD purchased graphics firm ATI. Sandy Bridge appeared on Intel's roadmaps a year or so later.

Familiarity should not breed contempt, though. It's hard not to be excited by what is arguably the biggest change to PC architecture for 20-plus years. This new approach to chip design is such a radical rethink of how a computer should be built that AMD has even come up with a new name for it: goodbye CPU, hello Accelerated Processing Unit (APU).

While we wish AMD the best of luck trying to get that new moniker to bed in, it is worth digging around on the company's website for the Fusion launch documents. The marketing has been done very well - the white paper PDF does an excellent job of explaining why putting graphics onto the processor die makes sense, and you can find it in a single click from the front page.

By comparison, Intel's site is more enigmatic and downplays the role of on-die graphics. The assumption seems to be that those who care already know, but most consumers are more interested in the number of cores a chip has.

The next big thing?

That's fair enough: computers are commodities now and a simple 'Intel Inside' has always been the company's best way of building its brand. It also works as a neat way of avoiding hubris.

In the world of PC tech, it's hard to work out what the next big thing will be and what is going to blow.

Nvidia

BATTLE LINES ARE DRAWN: Nvidia has some challenging times ahead

The CPU/GPU hybrid seems like a no-brainer, but a lot has changed in graphics since 3dfx first introduced the masses to the 3D video co-processor. It's been 15 years since Voodoo boards began to transform the sprite-based world of PC gaming, and with almost each new generation there's been some new feature that's promised to change the world.

Some of these breakthroughs have been welcome, and rightly gone on to achieve industry standard status. Routines for anti-aliasing, texture filtering and hardware transform and lighting were early candidates for standard adoption, and we now take it for granted that a new GPU will have programmable processors, HD video acceleration and unified shaders.

Other innovations, though, haven't found their way into the canon. At various times we've been promised by graphics vendors that the future lies in technologies that never picked up strong hardware support, such as voxels, tiling, ray tracing and variously outmoded ways of doing shadows.

Then there are those fancy sounding features that seem to have been around forever but still aren't widely used, such as tessellation, ring buses, GPU physics and even multicard graphics.

On a minor - related - note, hands up if you've ever used the digital vibrance slider in your control panel. Thought not.

All of which is not to say that Fusion and Sandy Bridge won't catch on. According to the roadmaps, it's going to be pretty hard to buy a CPU that doesn't have the graphics processor built in by the end of this year.

First-generation Core architecture chips are rapidly vanishing from Intel stockists, while AMD is expected to introduce a mainstream desktop combination chip, codenamed Lano, this summer with a high performance pairing based on the new Bulldozer CPU sometime in 2012.

If you buy a new PC by next spring it'll almost certainly have a hybrid processor at its heart.

There are three big advantages to hybrids. The first is that they're self-evidently very cost effective to manufacture compared to separate chips for the CPU and graphics and all the circuitry between.

Core i3

CORE I3: The first Sandy Bridge CPUs have an Intel HD 2000 performing the graphical grunt - or lack thereof

For similar reasons, they also require less power - there are fewer components and interconnects that need a steady flow of electrons, and even on the chip die itself Sandy Bridge and Fusion allow more sharing of resources than last year's Pinetrail and Arrandale forebears, which put graphics and CPU on two separate cores in the same package.

Finally, slapping everything on one piece of silicon improves the performance of the whole by an extra order of magnitude. Latency between the GPU and CPU is reduced - a factor very important for video editing - and both AMD and Intel are extending their CPU-based abilities for automatic overclocking to the GPU part of the wafer too.

It goes without saying that these advantages will only be apparent if you actually use the GPU part of the chip. But you can have the best of both worlds: switchable graphics such as Nvidia's Optimus chipsets are well established in notebooks already, including the MacBook Pro. These flick between integrated and discrete chips depending on whether or not you're gaming, in order to save battery life or increase framerates.

That's not really a technology that will find much footing on the desktop, where the power saving would be rather minimal for the effort involved, but that's not to say there are no opportunities there. A 'silent running' mode using the on-die GPU would be invaluable for media centres and all-in-one PCs, for example.

More importantly for us, once every PC has integrated graphics there's every likelihood that some GPU-friendly routines that are common in games - such as physics - could be moved onto there by default. It'd be better than the currently messy approach towards implementation of hardware acceleration for non-graphics gaming threads.

Can't do it all

That scenario, however, depends on an element of standardisation that may yet be lacking. Sandy Bridge contains an HD 3000 graphics core which, by all accounts, is Intel's best video processor to date.

HD 3000 is very good at encoding and decoding HD video, plus it supports DirectX 10.1 and OpenGL 2.0. That means it can use the GPU part of the core to accelerate programs such as Photoshop, Firefox 4 and some video transcoders too.

The problem is that, as has become almost traditional, Intel is a full generation behind everyone else when it comes to graphics. It's still living in a Vista world, while we're all on Windows 7. Don't even ask about Linux, by the way, as there's no support for Sandy Bridge graphics at all there yet (although both Intel and Linus Torvalds have promised it's coming).

Fusion, by comparison, has a well supported DirectX 11-class graphics chip based on its current Radeon HD6000 architecture. That means it supports the general purpose APIs OpenCL and DirectX Compute. Sandy Bridge doesn't - which may delay take up of these technologies for the time being.

GPCPU diagram

THE TIMES ARE A CHANGING: This is arguably the biggest change to PC architecture in two decades

Conversely, Sandy Bridge does feature the new Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) to the SSE part of the x86 instruction set. These are designed to speed up applications such as video processing by batching together groups of data, and won't be in AMD chips until Bulldozer arrives later this year.

You'll need Windows 7 SP1 to actually make use of AVX, mind you. But by the time applications that use them appear, most of us will be running that OS revision or later.

Gaming performance

All this is academic if you're just interested in playing games. A quick look at the benchmarks will show you that while the HD 3000 is better than its predecessors for gaming, it's still not much fun unless you're prepared to sacrifice a lot of image quality.

By comparison, the first desktop Fusion chips - codenamed Llano and based on the current K10 architecture - will have more in the way of graphics firepower. But an 80 pipeline Radeon core is still only half the power of AMD's most basic discrete card, the HD6450. We wouldn't recommend one of those, either.

Feedback from games developers we've spoken to has been mixed so far. On the whole, they have broadly welcomed hybrids, and some have gone as far as saying that Sandy Bridge will meet minimum graphics specifications for a number of quite demanding games. Shogun 2 and Operation Flashpoint: Red River are good examples of this.

Ultimately, though, developers are interested in hitting these system requirements because it opens up a large market for their games among laptop owners. As far as innovation goes, the cool kids still code at the cutting edge.

What of the future?

You might be tempted to point out that it's early days yet, and CP-GPU hybrids - for want of a better phrase - are still in their infancy. Give it a couple more years and the discrete graphics business could be dead.

John Carmack himself recently noted that he didn't see any big leaps for the PC's graphical prowess in the near future. That gives combination processors time to catch up, doesn't it?

Well, here are some numbers to convince you otherwise. Moore's Law says the number of transistors that can be cost effectively incorporated inside a chip will double every two years. A four-core Sandy Bridge processor with integrated HD 3000 graphics packs around 995 million transistors. According to Intel's oft-quoted founder, that means that we could expect CPUs in 2013 to boast 2,000 million transistors on a single die.

Sandy bridge

SANDY SILICON: Sandy Bridge is eminently suited to heavy-lifting tasks such as video and photo-editing

Sounds like a lot, until you realise that 2009's Radeon HD5850 already has a transistor count of 2,154 million - which would all have to be squashed onto a CPU die to replicate the performance levels.

By applying Moore's Law, then, it'll be at least 2015 to 2016 before you'll be able to play games at the resolution and quality you were used to 18 months ago. What are the odds of seven-year-old technology being considered more than adequate as an entry level system? Not high, are they?

By that reasoning hybrid processors are going to struggle to ever move up into the 'mainstream' performance class. You see, even though graphics engine development has slowed down considerably in recent years, games are still getting more demanding. Even World of Warcraft needs a fairly hefty system to see it presented at its best these days. Just Cause isn't a spectacular looker, but it can strain a respectable system beyond breaking point if you turn all the graphical settings up and the pretty bits on.

We're also finding new ways to challenge our hardware: multi-monitor gaming is now so common it's included in Valve's Steam Survey. That means higher resolutions and more anti-aliasing, neither of which are cheap in processing terms.

And even if Moore's Law were somehow accelerated so that in five years' time integrated GPUs could be cutting edge, a 4,000 million transistor chip is an enormous undertaking that would be expensive to get wrong. Yields would have to be exceptionally good to make it financially viable - it's a much safer bet to produce separate parts for the top performance class.

What's more, high graphics chips are incredibly different to CPUs in terms of manufacture and operating environment. They're almost mutually exclusive, in fact.

A Core i7, for example, consumes less power and runs much colder than a GeForce GTX570. Could you get the same graphics power without the 100ÂșC-plus heat? Unlikely.

The tolerance for error is also much lower - if a single pixel is corrupted on screen because the GPU is overheating, no-one notices, but if a CPU repeatedly misses a read/write operation you have a billion dollar recall to take care of.

The GPU is dead

It would be lovely to be proved wrong, though. If a scenario arises where we can get the same sort of performance from a single chip - with all the overclocking features - that we currently enjoy from the traditional mix of discrete GPU and dedicated CPU, then we'd be first in the queue to buy one.

Right now, though, both Nvidia and AMD reported growth in their graphics divisions during 2010, despite the appearance of Intel's Arrandale hybrids early in the year. Perhaps this is the more likely outcome: it's easy to envision a world in, say, a decade or so, when the market for PC 'separates' is similar to the hi-fi one.

Because after a century of miniaturisation and integration there, valve amps are still the apeothesis of style and performance. In other words, a CPU/GPU hybrid chip may be good enough one day, but it won't be the best. And that is what we will always demand.




View the original article here

 
Free Host | new york lasik surgery | cpa website design